Cartoonist Suffering From Serious Eyesight Perception Problem?

I was discussing the "No Child Left Behind," program introduced by President Bush with a friend the other day, and we got to wondering why he hadn’t included thorough eyechecks for each child. Maybe, if he had, problems could be caught in time to prevent the obvious poor eyesight many Democrats seem to have when they grow up.

For example, one of my acquaintances, a lifelong Democrat, is always telling me that she does not trust President Bush because he has “beady eyes.” Now I have studied dozens of photos of the President, and, so far, none of them show a single beady eye. Therefore, I have concluded that my friend needs new glasses.

In our town, the only newspaper is blatantly Democratic. All the columnists give us a constant barrage of how awful President Bush is, how nothing he has done or ever will do is right, and how Republicans are nothing but a bunch of ignorant rednecks, being guided by those h-o-r-r-i-b-l-e, right wing, homophobic, fundamentalist, Christians and talk-show hosts. Well, maybe so, but if you read our local newspaper, you would see why it is such a relief to turn on Rush, or Larrs, or Sean once in a while in order to get a breath of fresh air; but I digress.

What I intended to tell you about our newspaper, concerns the Democratic artist who provides us with our daily political cartoon. The president, in these cartoons, always has little, pointy ears, and is portrayed as being a very short man. In reality, his ears look like pretty normal ears to me, and he is actually taller than most other men that appear in news pictures with him. Do you think they send out a call for a bunch of “shorties” to walk along by the President whenever he is to be photographed? I don’t think that would be practical so I can only come to one other conclusion; the democtratic cartoonist, at lease in our town, needs glasses.

Another alarming thing I have noticed in the last five years, is that the President, in political cartoons, seems to be growing shorter by the day. Is this some warped attempt by the cartoonist to make the President completely disappear by the time his term ends? No doubt, this would make his opponents happy, but I don’t think it’s going to happen.

I have considered the possibilty that this particular cartoonist not only needs to have his eyes checked, but to lay of the booze and marijuana as well.

Well, enough of that for now. In case you were planning to write and tell me that it is MY eyes that need checking, rest assured, that possibily has crossed my mind so I did rush right down to my Opthamologist to see if anything was wrong.

Result, my eyes are just fine. How about yours?

It's just a cartoon....and

It's just a cartoon....and it's America if you don't like the caroonist don't read his cartoons...
my blogevolve blog

huttriver12's picture

And you can have your Republican Party...

continue with a new President. I wouldn't be so arrogant to presume how to tell you Americans how to run your country - but do they want a continuation of Republican policies? They know the bush from the trees now, don't they?

Visit Blogfeast

The Kiwi Riverman

The Geminian's picture

Cartoonists, Bush, and America

Cartoonists have to say everything with a picture, if the picture is of President Bush, and it were required to be as accurate as reality, they may as well put in a photograph, but the cartoonist is trying to say more with his picture. If the artist draws a short Bush it is mostly likely to represent a lack of popularity or lack of respect by the people for Bush, if he is "growing shorter," it probably represents the continual regression of his approval rating. The small pointed ears probably represent the artist's viewpoint that Bush does not listen to the voice of his people.

When the President was elected he had only half the people's support, he was half of the peoples man, or half a man to all the people, (by my definition, his opponent would have also been "Half the man to all the people.")Either way, this can be represented graphically by drawing a shorter Bush.

This represents the true problem here, that America is divided, fractured, severed, or just plain not UNITED. This is not Bush's fault or Clinton's fault, this is the state of our nation, a divided house..., a nation of individuals, a group of seperatists. This social fission will only grow on its present course. When Clinton was in the White House, he was barrades just the same by Republicans, the media, and yes cartoonists.

If you want to see a people united try taking away that cartoonists right to free speech, or jailing everyone that disagrees with you. It is essential that people disagree here in America, as it truly demonstrates that we still have the freedoms this country was founded upon. The next time someone expresses a different point of view openly, just say, "that's right, we are still free".

I am neither Democrat nor Republican, both of these parties have had over a hundred years to lead this country, and it is worse than ever.

(CAUTION! A Geminian level rant is about to ensue!)

I grew up an innocent boy, (cub scout, boy scout, crossing guard, big brother and a soldier,) who was taught how to do good and the goodness of our country and its' good christian people. Since then, I have seen America and her whores, homosexuals, gangbangers, tweekers, alcoholics, child molestors, serial killers, corrupt cops, govermental abuses of power, blatent propaganda, misinformation, deviant priests, child killers, drug dealers, scam artists, back stabbing, back stepping, selfish opportunistic capitalists, hate mongers, war mongers, fear mongers, girls gone wild, rapists, liars, cheaters, pill poppers, student seducers, gamblers, federal torturers, and drunk drivers.

What a dispicable place. It is no wonder so many people throughout the world think we are evil.

(Rant concluded)

So you see, I am neither Democrat nor Republican. I wonder why anyone would want to be associated with these two groups who have such a long history of ineptitude and who continually fail to perform. Are you a democrat only to not be a republican? A republican to not be a democrat? Did you only have two choices? I have the only choice, a group whose membership does not require a division of the people, that does not segregate, or separate people but unites them, one that will long outlive the Democrats and the Republicans, and it has the right name, I am an AMERICAN, any other group is divisive and detrimental to all of our well being.

(OK, I was still ranting)

I have also been outside of America, I lived in Germany for 3 years. When I left, I remember them saying the Nuclear Family is dying, when I returned, it was dead, replaced by a divided nation of stepdads, and single mothers, and visitations. I'm not sure what I missed, but the same can be equated to the Nation as a family, fractured. I may be wrong but it all happened when Glam rock gave way to Grunge. That may seem unrelated but, I would say from my perspective that when I left America, she was more festive and rocking to Bon Jovi, when I returned three years later, she was depressed, pill popping and jaded, and listening to Nirvanna. The bands themsselves only show the preference of the people.

This "depression" and "jade" coupled with the division of the people and the death of the nuclear family allows the entire nation to sway off course, and the mass introduction of decay and the bacteria that feeds upon it.

Are We Still the "Home Of The Brave?"

huttriver12's picture

This is actually a western...

thing. Because just as America became the 'same', so is western society. You have Republicans, we have the right of centre National Party. You have Democrats, we have the left of centre Labour Party.

Visit Blogfeast

The Kiwi Riverman

Most Americans might enjoy a centre National Party.

Unfortunately, we are forced to go either far right or far left. Personally, I see President Bush as a great improvement over ex-President Clinton, and the thought that Mr. Clinton might worm his way back into the White House, via his wife, Senator Clinton, makes me ill. Can the American people possibly be so ignorant that they would allow this to happen? We shall see in November, 2008.

The Geminian's picture

Jeanne, Please explain..

why you feel Bush is an improvement over Clinton.

Some of the things Clinton did : Commissioned 100,000 police officers, eliminated the deficit, tried to actually kill Osama, inreased minimum wage, authored legislation to help children against poverty, tobacco, drugs, large classrooms, lack of medical insurance, sexual predators.

Signed Legislation to End Drive-Through Deliveries

Forgave $500 million in African debt

Created Nine New National Monuments

secured $1.1 billion in FY 2000 for research and development of energy efficiency and clean energy technologies, and set a goal of tripling U.S. use of bio-energy and bio-products by 2010

Integrating China into the world economy through landmark agreement for China's entry into the World Trade

Enacted the Workforce Investment Act

Extending the Life of the Medicare Trust Fund.

Most of president Clinton's accomplishments have less to do with war and military and more to do with peace and citizens.

More info on Clinton's accomplishments :

http://home.att.net/~jrhsc/jobwelldone.html

Are We Still the "Home Of The Brave?"

Geminian, I appreciate your well-thought-out comments.

I have decided to stop the discussion, at least on my part, with this final entry.

As far as I am concerned, Mr. Clinton totally demeaned the formerly respected office of the President of the United States. While some of his accomplishments may have been of lasting value, many of them are only routine things any president in office during peacetime could and probably would have done.

When Mr. Clinton left the White House, he enacted a number of laws designed to hamstring the incoming government. How vindictive and childish for a man holding such an important office.

Since your comment points out the things you feel were positive accomplishments by our former president, I thought it only fair to add some others which come from an e-mail
that has been making its rounds on the internet for some time. The e-mail follows:

"Dear Mr. Ex President Clinton:

1. Thank you for introducing us to Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Dolly Kyle Browning, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita Broderick. Did I leave anyone out?

2. Thank you for teaching my 8 year old about oral sex. I had really planned to wait until he was a little older to discuss it with him, but now he knows more about it than I did as a senior in college.

3. Thank you for showing us that sexual harassment in the work place(especially the White House) and on the job is OK, and all you have to know is what the meaning of "is" is. It really is great to know that certain sexual acts are not sex, and one person may have sex while the other one does NOT have sex.

4. Thank you for reintroducing the concept of impeachment to a new generation and demonstrating that the ridiculous plot of the movie "Wag the Dog" could be plausible after all.

5. Thanks for making Jimmy Carter look competent, Gerald Ford look graceful, Richard Nixon look honest, Lyndon Johnson look truthful,and John Kennedy look moral.

6. Thank you for the 73 House and Senate witnesses who have plead the 5th Amendment and 17 witnesses who have fled the country to avoid testifying about Democratic campaign fund raising

7. Thank you, for the 19 charges, 8 convictions, and 4
imprisonment's from the Whitewater "mess" and the 55 criminal charges and 32 criminal convictions (so far) in the other "Clinton" scandals.

8. Thanks also for reducing our military by half, "gutting" much of our foreign policy, and flying all over the world on "vacations" carefully disguised as necessary trips.

9 Thank you, also, for "finding" millions of dollars (I really didn't need it in the first place, and I can't think of a more deserving group of recipients for my hard-earned tax dollars) for all of your globe-trotting. I understand you, the family and your cronies have logged in more time aboard Air Force One than any other administration.

10. Now that you've left the White House, thanks for the 140 pardons of convicted felons and indicted felons-in-exile. We will love to have them rejoin society. (Not to mention the scores you pardoned while Governor of Arkansas)

11. Thanks also for removing the White House silverware. I'm sure that Laura Bush didn't like the pattern anyway. Also, enjoy the housewarming gifts you've received from your "friends."

12. Thanks to you and your staff in the West Wing of the White House for vandalizing and destroying government property on the way out. I also appreciate removing all of that excess weight (China, silverware, linen, towels, ash trays, soap, pens, magnetic compass, flight manuals, etc.) out of Air Force 1. The weight savings means burning less fuel, thus less tax dollars spent on jet fuel. Thank you!

13. And finally, please ensure that Hillary enjoys the $8 million dollar advance for her "tell-all" book and you, Bill, the $10 million advance for your memoirs. Who says crime doesn't pay!

14. The last and most important point - thank you for forcing Israel to let Mohammed Atta go free. Terrorist pilot Mohammed Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release so-called "political prisoners".
However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands. The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "insisted" that all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammed Atta was freed and eventually
thanked the US by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center.

This was reported by many of the American TV networks at the time that the terrorists were first identified. It was censored in the US from all later reports. Why shouldn't Americans know the real truth?

AND THE REST OF THE STORY Hillary Rodham Clinton, as a New York State Senator, now comes under the "Congressional Retirement and Staffing Plan," which means that even if she never gets reelected, she STILL receives her Congressional salary until she dies. (Would it not be nice if all Americans were pension eligible after only 6years?)

If Bill outlives her, he then inherits HER salary until HE dies. He is already getting his Presidential salary until he dies. If Hillary outlives Bill, she also gets HIS salary until she dies. Guess who pays for that? WE DO!

It's common knowledge that in order for her to establish NY
residency, they purchased a million dollar-plus house in upscale Chappaqua, New York.

Makes sense. They are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense.

Here is where it becomes interesting. Their mortgage payments hover at around $10,000 per month. BUT, an extra residence HAD to be built within the acreage to house the Secret Service agents.

The Clintons charge the Federal government $10,000 monthly rent for the use of that extra residence, which is just about equal to their mortgage payment. This means that we, the taxpayers, are paying the Clinton's salary, mortgage, transportation, safety and security, as well as the salaries for their 12 man staff -- and, this is all
perfectly legal!

When she runs for President, will you vote for her?"

huttriver12's picture

I think history will be kind...

to Bill Clinton as a president, but not as a person who couldn't control his sexual urges.With the greatest respect, you appear to have a bias against the Democrat Party anyway, and that's your right. but it could cloud your feelings though.

Visit Blogfeast

The Kiwi Riverman

Unfortunately, Geminian, most of what you say is absolutely

true, but I refuse to think that all is lost. Maybe we can each change only one small thing at a time, but if all those who feel discouraged about the situation work for change in their own small sphere of relatives, friends, and acquaintances, who knows what could happen?

As for the cartoons about the President, I think you are reading far too much into them. It seems more likely to me that the cartoonist can't stand President Bush so he makes his portrayals of him as unappealing and demeaning as possible. If he likes his subject, his cartoons are more favorable. Although I saw one of Senator Clinton by this same cartoonist the other day which made her look at least 110. All wrinkled and hunched over. I guess he must be an Obama man. I really couldn't read any "divided America" significance into the haggard Hilary he had drawn.

Thanks for the great comments, Djbtol.

It is always nice to hear from a fellow-blogger who supports my point of view, because, as I have found out many times in the past, few do. (At least where religion or politics are concerned.)

My husband says that's because usually only people who disagree strongly will bother to write. If people agree with what they read, they usually nod, or say "amen" and go on their way without further comment.

I'm trying to do a better job of commenting on those I agree with instead of only rising to action when one makes me angry or totally distorts the truth. :)

huttriver12's picture

I have to be careful as a non-American...

not to be considered as an arrogant Kiwi trying to tell you what is best for America. But I can safely say that Bush is your worst president since 'Tricky Dick' Nixon. You can vote for whoever you want.

Visit Blogfeast

The Kiwi Riverman

I totally disagree -

Presdient Bush has shown a strength in leadership that is amazing and has been best for the USA. We need Presidents who operate on principle and not political favor. However, I will concede that his push for the illegal immigrant amnesty bill was off-base.

djbtol
djbtol BlogFeast

Jellen's picture

As djbtol knows,

You won't usually find me saying much about political matters, but he knows I'm right in there reading and agreeing. So know, ms. Jeanne, I am following and agreeing.

Rhyme Light - part inspiration, part verse

Thanks Jellen, perhaps the silent majority does still live.

My own private opinion is that most of the problems our country faces could be easily solved, if all those who claim to be Christian would heed the Biblical exhortation in II Chronicles 7:14.

Unfortunately, the pace of life we have fallen into in America these days leaves most of us saying at the end of each day, "Oh, oh, another busy day gone already. Well, I'll set aside some time for God, tomorrow, for sure."

You know as well as I

that there are literally thousands of things I could write in response to this post and they would be in agreement with what you wrote.

I will contain my comments to just a couple:

The campaign of hate speech that has been initiated and sustained by the Democrats against Presdent Bush has exceeded many times over all other forms of hate speech combined. Even if you do not agree with him, there is no justification for the campaign of hatred and nastiness that has been launched against him.

You talk about the liberal bias of the main stream media and you are so right. What is ironic to the point of being hilarious is that the Democrat candidates will not allow Fox TV to host a debate because they say Fox is biased. Almost beyond belief that they would make that argument considering they have the main stream media in their back pocket. Of course the recent noise about the Fairness Doctrine only applies to conservative talk radio programs.

Merely stating the obvious.

djbtol
djbtol BlogFeast