It has been reported that five teenage boys armed with machetes and baseball bats stormed a Sydney high school. They were bent on destruction of classrooms, glass windows and whatever. Eighteen students and one teacher were injured.
The five youths were from 14 to 16 years old. When confronted by the police, they dropped their weapons and did not resist arrest. The rampage only lasted about six minutes and the motivation remains a mystery.
When I read this, I was immediately struck by the uniqueness of this attack. In the U.S. such acts of school violence have always involved guns and loss of life. Why would these five youths adopt such an agenda of violence, and then not use guns? Was it too difficult to get guns, or did they really not want to kill anyone?
Finally, shall we just assume that they wanted to go to jail? In other acts of school violence, I think the perpetrators expect to lose their life in the mission. I don't think these five had any thought of dying.
djbtol
















29 min 39 sec ago
1 hour 33 min ago
1 hour 55 min ago
1 hour 59 min ago
18 hours 42 min ago
18 hours 43 min ago
19 hours 1 min ago
19 hours 47 min ago
19 hours 49 min ago
20 hours 16 min ago