Obama Chooses Murder
Apparently it is a great day for American women because obama has used his mighty powers to "protect women's health and reproductive freedom." Just the kind of leader every country should have.
So, if you are a woman, and ever find yourself with child, obama wants to assure you that it is perfectly fine with him if you murder that baby. Also, because obama believes "that government should not intrude on our most private family matters" he is not going to dictate the murder weapon, so you do have choices. You can poison the baby, you can suck the baby out in pieces with a vacuum, or if you are patient, you can wait until the baby is viable and jam a scissors into its skull. Just the kind of leader every country needs.
This post would be so much more meaningful with pictures, but I suspected that some would be offended. Is the murder of babies less offensive without the pictures? For those who want to face reality: Go to google.com, choose images and type in 'aborted babies'. The pictures are disturbing.
This is no surprise, of course. Obama is the one who claims in the case of failed abortions, the doctors must continue the assault until the job is done. Don't you dare try to save that life! I guess it is an extra special day for the women who voted for Obama.
Nothing could be more hypocritical than for Obama to say government should not intrude. Next to Hussein, 'intrude' is his middle name. Do you realize it only takes one anonymous phone call of a suspected family problem, and children's services can take the children out of that home. Sounds like government intrusion to me. Yet, when a baby's life is at stake, obama wants to hide in his oval office.
When a culture kills their babies (even if they do not eat them), you know it is headed down hill.
djbtol
- djbtol's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 121 reads
User login
Recent blog posts
New forum topics
Who's online
Syndicate
Comments
This issue is volatile, though I fail to comprehend
how so many have determined that protecting innocent and defenseless life is even debatable. Aborting babies as an industry, and a government funded one at that, is one of the biggest stains on human history ever!
One of the next steps for this administration is inevitably the sanctioning of creating life with the express purpose of taking it so that we can harvest what scientists want to tinker with in their labs. It is gut-wrenching to me.
Live Well, Learn Much, Laugh Often
to make an anonymous prayer request send an email it to
prayercorner@ymail.com
Not necessarily..
if you mean stem cell research. They could use a person's own stem cells for later use. If you mean using stem cells from partly developed foetus, that is entirely a different matter for society to consider.
My Qassia Link
The Kiwi Riverman
Factual TV
The left in the US
consistently push for embryonic stem cell research. There has been significant medical progress with other types of stem cells, but that kind of news rarely even makes the news. The agenda (which includes the abortion industry) is written first, and then the facts are fashioned to support that agenda.
djbtol
Money4Net
Clix n Cash!
Easy Hits 4U
Its a beautiful summers day here in NZ...
and I have to keep out of the sun's rays these days because of my skin cancers.
My Qassia Link
The Kiwi Riverman
Factual TV
Hopefully
that skin cancer is healing up for you. Can you go out with hat and sun screen, or must you avoid all together? Do you want to spend more time outside?
djbtol
Money4Net
Clix n Cash!
Easy Hits 4U
I used to like spending a few hours out...
in the sun, but our southern sun exposure is much more dangerous than in other places because of the hole in the ozone layer.
My Qassia Link
The Kiwi Riverman
Factual TV
Sorry to hear
that. I've seen information on the hole. Some say it is starting to decrease. Others are not so sure. Either way, I would say the Montreal Protocol for decreased emissions of ozone depleting substances was a successful global effort.
djbtol
Money4Net
Clix n Cash!
Easy Hits 4U
It varies I think...
depending on the time of year. We are right in mid-summer now so it is probably at its worst.
My Qassia Link
The Kiwi Riverman
Factual TV
It doesn't seem to make any difference Hutt, whether or not
you are in the majority. The majority of citizens in the United States believe in God, but the minority has its way in wiping the very mention of God out of our lives in a lot of cases. As for the abortion question, why not practice birth control so abortion wouldn't become a problem in the first place?
I see President Obama's lifting of the ban on providing funds for abortion as a rather sneaky way to cut down their population, not as any concern for the rights of women. (And speaking of women's rights, I'm with Djbtol. Since when does anyone have the right to take the life of another human being just because that life might be bothersome to their own personal life?)
But they do...
but the Pope condemns the use of birth control.
My Qassia Link
The Kiwi Riverman
Factual TV
The Pope
is the Pope. Many Christians are not Catholic and don't even know the Pope. My perception of Catholics in America is that most of them really don't bother with what the Pope says.
djbtol
Money4Net
Clix n Cash!
Easy Hits 4U
Even the Catholic church allows one form of birth control, Hutt,
but that is beside the point. Christians, according to the Bible, are not supposed to be taking their marching orders from the Pope.
That is the control of...
abstinence!
My Qassia Link
The Kiwi Riverman
Factual TV
So, if the left
and their president make public their claim that a woman has the right (not sure what authority gave them that right) to choose, that is freedom of speech. But if the right says she does not have the right to take a God-given life, that is "forcing your opinion on those you may disagree with." That does not make sense.
If the left can boldly claim their views, then the right can also. And I am probably a long way from believing that the only answer to life's problems is to kill the baby.
You know, men and women have lots of freedom to choose before the baby is conceived. Abortion allows people to screw up that decision and act like there are no consequences.
Actually the founding fathers of the US did rely on religion as well as consensus. Even though there were different faiths, they could agree on certain moral values. Times are different now and I know that many people need no excuse other than convenience to have the abortion. Where will it stop?
Thanks for responding, Hutt. I know you do not agree with my whacked out views, but there is no-one else around to reply.
Have a great day.
djbtol
Money4Net
Clix n Cash!
Easy Hits 4U
Abortion is a subject that has only two sides...
to it - you can't really sit on the fence. If you are deeply religious you will totally condemn the loss of potential lives. But government is not by religion it has to be by consensus, and religious people are no longer the majority. Therefore it has to be allowed with constraints applied to it. I don't really want to go into that because basically I don't support it, but understand why governments in the West have to allow it!
Actually the same goes for religion - there has to be religious and non-religious freedom, and a consensus led government which has to apply the majority viewpoint, whether the religious right in any Western society agrees or not! Of course you would never agree to that, and that is your right; but don't try and force your opinions on those you may disagre with. A very complex business.
My Qassia Link
The Kiwi Riverman
Factual TV